Transcendental Argument
The transcendental method...does not try to prove that genuine knowledge is possible; rather, it presupposes that it is. Then it asks, What must the world, the mind and human thought be like if this presupposition is true? The transcendental method then goes ahead to ask what the necessary conditions of human knowledge are. The answer must first of all must be the existence of the God of Scripture. To Van Til, this principle was not only a fact, but an argument for the existence of God. Without God there is no meaning (truth, rationality, etc.); therefore, God, exists.
John Frame Apologetics to the Glory of God, pg. 70
By Scripture
Old Testament
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers
Deuteronomy
Joshua
Judges
Ruth
1 Samuel
2 Samuel
1 Kings
2 Kings
1 Chronicles
2 Chronicles
Ezra
Nehemiah
Esther
Job
Psalms
Proverbs
Ecclesiastes
Song of Solomon
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Lamentations
Ezekiel
Daniel
Hosea
Joel
Amos
Obadiah
Jonah
Micah
Nahum
Habakkuk
Zephaniah
Haggai
Zechariah
Malachi
New Testament
Matthew
Mark
Luke
John
Acts
Romans
1 Corinthians
2 Corinthians
Galatians
Ephesians
Philippians
Colossians
1 Thessalonians
2 Thessalonians
1 Timothy
2 Timothy
Titus
Philemon
Hebrews
James
1 Peter
2 Peter
1 John
2 John
3 John
Jude
Revelation
Latest Links
William Bridge
William Perkins
Jeremy Sexton
Ralph Venning
John Knox
Archibald Alexander
Mitch Chase
Joel R Beeke
Jonathon Van Maren
Mitch Chase
Alexander Strauch
Michael McClymond
Burk Parsons
David Strain
Nicholas T Batzig
Christopher Gordon
Monergism Books
Jeremiah Burroughs
Reformation Theology
Ron DiGiacomo
Kevin DeYoung
Carl Trueman
Thomas Kidd
Dr Sinclair B Ferguson
Samuel Slater
ReformationTheology Blog
Michael J Kruger
William Bridge
Benjamin Glaser
Melton L. Duncan
Jonathan Master
Dr Sinclair B Ferguson
Anthony Burgess
Alistair Begg
Kevin DeYoung
William Bridge
William Benn
Wilhelmus a Brakel
William Gearing