Transcendental Argument

The transcendental method...does not try to prove that genuine knowledge is possible; rather, it presupposes that it is. Then it asks, What must the world, the mind and human thought be like if this presupposition is true? The transcendental method then goes ahead to ask what the necessary conditions of human knowledge are. The answer must first of all must be the existence of the God of Scripture. To Van Til, this principle was not only a fact, but an argument for the existence of God. Without God there is no meaning (truth, rationality, etc.); therefore, God, exists.

John Frame Apologetics to the Glory of God, pg. 70

Transcendental Arguments

Web Page by Dr. John Frame

"The Transcendental Argument for God's Existence"

Web Page by Michael R Butler

An Answer to a Refutation of the Transcendental Argument

Web Page by Matt Slick

An Answer to Another Response to the Transcendental Argument

Web Page by Matt Slick

Shall We Argue Transcendentally?

Web Page by Greg Welty

Frame on Van Til and Transcendental Arguments

Web Page by Michael R Butler

The Drange-Wilson Debate

Web Page by Douglas Wilson

The Transendantal Method of Apologetics

PDF by Charles Biggs

Derrida, Van Til and the Metaphysics of Postmodernism

Web Page by Jacob Gabriel Hale

Is the Transcendental Argument Fair?

Web Page by Reformed Apologist

Van Til and Transcendental Argument Revisited

PDF by Reformed Apologist

What Is the Best Argument for the Existence of God?

Web Page by Jason Lisle

“No Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter

PDF by James Anderson