Secularism, a worldview that emerged from Enlightenment ideas in the 17th and 18th centuries, aims to build society and understand human experience apart from any religious or divine foundation, advocating that reason and empirical science alone should govern public life. It reduces human beings to physical and social entities, limiting purpose and morality to human consensus and cultural norms, and views religion as a private or subjective matter, not relevant to societal governance.
Secularism’s implementation removes religious values from law, education, and politics, asserting that a neutral or purely rational basis—free from religious “bias”—is more just and unifying. However, this “neutrality” inherently denies the transcendent, leaving only human authority to define meaning and ethics. Without an objective moral foundation, secularism often falls into moral relativism, treating truth and values as fluctuating rather than absolute.
Secular vs. Secularism
The word “secular” merely reflects the diversity of beliefs and practices in a pluralistic world, such as secular music, education, or holidays. By contrast, “secularism” is an ideology that advocates for the exclusion of religious influence from public life, aiming to base social and legal systems purely on human reasoning and scientific knowledge. While secular acknowledges religious and non-religious coexistence, secularism pushes for a worldview where public matters operate independently of religious values, often reducing reality to only the material or empirical.
For example, the United States was established as a secular society, structured to uphold freedom of religion by allowing diverse religious and non-religious beliefs to coexist without endorsing any single viewpoint. This secular framework promotes the separation of church and state, protecting individuals' rights to express their beliefs freely. However, this approach differs from secularism, which often aims to exclude religious influence from public life. While a secular society respects a plurality of beliefs, secularism can be exclusionary, favoring a worldview that treats secular reasoning as the default standard in public discourse, potentially marginalizing religious perspectives.
To preserve freedom of conscience in a secular society while avoiding both coercion and the pitfalls of pluralism and relativism, it’s essential to distinguish between secularism as a worldview and secular society as a fact of diversity. Recognizing that a secular society includes varied beliefs without enforcing secularism as an official doctrine allows space for all perspectives, religious and non-religious alike, to contribute in the public sphere. Through open debate, the most compelling ideas are tested in a marketplace of free expression, rather than a state-imposed ideology.
Essential Safeguards:
Separation of Powers and Limited Government: Ensures that no single authority, even a majority, can overreach. Concentrated power is dangerous due to humanity's sinful nature, as it easily leads to tyranny.
Bill of Rights and Protections for Minority Voices: A robust bill of rights guarantees that even minority views are protected, allowing freedom of conscience and expression without fear of suppression.
Distinction Between Secular and Secularist: Viewing secular society as diverse rather than inherently secularist encourages inclusivity. Secularism as a worldview should not monopolize policymaking; instead, all views, including religious ones, should have a voice in public discourse, particularly in public education.
Critique from a Biblical Perspective
The Christian worldview, by contrast, sees humanity as created in God's image (Genesis 1:27), designed with purpose, dignity, and moral accountability rooted in God’s nature. The Bible teaches that human reason and morality reflect God’s truth, as God’s revelation provides the grounding for justice, compassion, and truth (Romans 2:15). While secularism views purpose as subjective, Christianity reveals that true meaning comes from a relationship with God, who provides enduring purpose (Ecclesiastes 12:13).
Secularism ultimately underestimates human nature’s need for moral absolutes, reducing ethics to societal agreement and ignoring the spiritual dimension that drives human conscience and accountability (Romans 1:18-20). This gap leads to moral inconsistency, as secularism calls for justice and equality without a transcendent source of rights or purpose. In the Christian worldview, God’s sovereignty undergirds justice and compassion, aligning with humanity’s intrinsic sense of right and wrong and pointing to Christ as the ultimate source of redemption and hope.
Secularists invariably face a consistency issue when expressing moral outrage, as their worldview lacks a stable foundation for objective moral standards. While secularism rejects absolute truths, moral outrage (at others) implies a belief in universal rights or wrongs that are binding on all. Without an objective, transcendent standard (like that provided in Christianity), secular moral judgments can only be based on shifting societal norms or personal preferences, which lack binding authority over others. In contrast, Christianity provides an objective standard for morality rooted in God’s unchanging nature, making moral accountability coherent and grounded in reality.
Note: Te Bible warns of the danger of centralizing authority (1 Samuel 8) and emphasizes human sinfulness, requiring accountability in governance. With no expectation of utopia, a democratic republic with a balanced power structure aligns better with human nature’s realities, allowing freedom and moral discourse while resisting the authoritarian tendencies innate in any fallen society. A purely democratic system can turn into tyranny of the majority. A democratic republic, by contrast, with separation of powers and checks and balances, tempers majority rule to protect minority rights. History shows that concentrating power in any ideology leads to oppression, while a well-structured democratic republic, though imperfect, promotes liberty and accountability.
-----
Related Resources @Monergism