This month we celebrate our 25th Anniversary - We Thank the Lord for You.

We are delighted that you use the free resources available at Monergism. Our mission is to provide open access to scripturally sound and theologically rich Christian literature, ensuring cost is never a barrier to building a robust Christian library. While these resources are free to all, sustaining this ministry requires funding.

Last year, over 1 million new visitors accessed our resources. Given that less than 1% of readers donate, we humbly ask you to consider supporting this ministry. If everyone reading this gave just $5, we could meet our 2024 budget in no time.

Every contribution makes a difference - whether it's a monthly gift of $20 or a one-time donation of $10, $25, $100, or more. You can also read our business plan to see how your gifts are used to further this mission.

Monergism (CPRF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, and all donations are tax-deductible.

Donate

Docetism

Docetism is an early Christological heresy that denies the true humanity of Jesus Christ, claiming that his physical body was either an illusion or that he only appeared to be human. The term "Docetism" comes from the Greek word dokein, meaning "to seem" or "to appear." According to this heresy, Christ's sufferings, death, and physical experiences were not real, because he was not truly incarnate in human flesh. This belief undermines essential doctrines of the Incarnation, the Atonement, and the Resurrection, which are foundational to Christian faith.

History of Docetism

  1. Early Church and Gnostic Origins: Docetism arose in the early Christian period, particularly in the context of Gnosticism, a widespread religious movement that thrived in the 2nd and 3rd centuries. Gnostics believed in a dualistic worldview, where the spiritual realm was considered pure and good, while the material world was viewed as evil and corrupt. In this context, Docetism developed as a way to reconcile the Gnostic disdain for the physical world with belief in Jesus Christ. For Gnostics and early Docetists, it was unthinkable that the divine Christ could truly take on a material body, which they viewed as inherently evil.

  2. Apostolic Period: Elements of Docetism appeared even during the time of the New Testament. The apostle John, in his letters, seems to combat early forms of Docetism by emphasizing the reality of Christ's humanity. In 1 John 4:2-3, John writes, "Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God." Similarly, in 2 John 7, he warns against deceivers who "do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh." These passages reflect an early polemic against those who denied the true humanity of Christ, likely proto-Docetists or Gnostics.

  3. Influence in Gnosticism: By the 2nd century, Gnostic sects like the Valentinians and the Marcionites espoused Docetism, teaching that Christ’s body was only a phantom or that he was a spiritual being who only appeared to suffer and die. Marcion, for example, rejected the idea of the Incarnation, teaching that Christ was sent by a higher God than the creator God of the Old Testament and only appeared to be human. Gnostic Docetists believed that salvation was achieved through escaping the material world, not through Christ’s physical death and resurrection, which they viewed as unnecessary.

  4. Opposition from Church Fathers: The early church fathers, including Ignatius of Antioch, Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Hippolytus, vigorously opposed Docetism. Ignatius, writing in the early 2nd century, specifically targeted Docetism in his letters, emphasizing the reality of Christ’s physical incarnation and his true suffering and death. In his letter to the Smyrnaeans, Ignatius writes, "He truly suffered, even as He truly raised Himself up, not, as some unbelievers say, that He suffered in appearance." These writings are key testimonies to the church's early defense of Christ’s full humanity.

  5. Decline: While Docetism was especially influential within Gnosticism, it never gained widespread acceptance in orthodox Christianity. By the time of the Council of Nicaea (325 AD), the church had largely rejected Docetism, and the Nicene Creed affirmed Christ’s full humanity and divinity. However, elements of Docetism have re-emerged in various forms throughout church history, especially in movements that de-emphasize the physical aspects of Christ's life and focus instead on his spiritual or divine nature.

Theology of Docetism

The core theological error of Docetism is its denial of the true humanity of Jesus Christ. Docetists believed that because the material world is corrupt, Christ could not have taken on a real human body. This led to several key doctrinal errors:

  1. Denial of the Incarnation: Docetists taught that Jesus only appeared to be human but was not truly incarnate. They rejected the idea that the divine Son of God could take on flesh and blood. Some Docetists believed that Christ’s physical body was an illusion, while others claimed that he took on a temporary, non-physical form that looked like a human body.

  2. Denial of Christ’s Suffering and Death: Docetism undermines the reality of Christ’s suffering and crucifixion, claiming that Jesus did not actually experience pain, death, or physical resurrection. This belief is rooted in the idea that the divine could not undergo the corruptibility of human flesh, and therefore, Christ’s suffering was only apparent, not real.

  3. Dualism: Docetism is closely tied to dualism, particularly the Gnostic distinction between the spiritual and material realms. In this worldview, the spiritual is inherently good, and the material is inherently evil. Therefore, Docetists could not accept that Christ, a divine being, could take on a material body, which they believed to be corrupt and evil.

  4. Rejection of the Atonement: Since Docetism denies the reality of Christ's physical suffering and death, it also undermines the doctrine of the Atonement. In orthodox Christian theology, Christ’s physical death on the cross is central to human redemption. Docetism, by denying that Christ truly died in the flesh, denies the saving work of Christ’s sacrifice and resurrection.

Historic Christian Orthodox View

The historic Christian orthodox view, as articulated in the Nicene Creed, the Apostles' Creed, and later councils such as Chalcedon (451 AD), affirms both the full divinity and full humanity of Jesus Christ. The church has always taught that Jesus is truly God and truly man, united in one person. This understanding is essential to Christian belief in the Incarnation and the Atonement.

  1. The Incarnation: Orthodox Christianity teaches that in the Incarnation, the second person of the Trinity, the Son of God, took on a full human nature, including a real body and soul. John 1:14 states, “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us,” clearly affirming the reality of Christ’s physical humanity. The church teaches that Christ is fully human and fully divine in one person, a doctrine known as the hypostatic union.

  2. The Real Suffering and Death of Christ: Orthodox Christianity insists on the reality of Christ’s physical suffering, death, and resurrection. Without a real human body, Christ could not have died for humanity’s sins or risen from the dead. The Apostles' Creed and the Nicene Creed both affirm that Christ “suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried.” His real death and resurrection are essential to the Christian belief in salvation through the Atonement.

  3. Christ’s Full Humanity and Full Divinity: The Council of Chalcedon (451 AD) clarified that Christ has two natures, divine and human, united in one person “without confusion, without change, without division, and without separation”. This means that Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man. His human nature is complete, with a real body, mind, and soul, just like other humans, except that he was sinless. The church rejected any attempts, like Docetism, to diminish Christ’s true humanity or divine nature.

  4. Salvation Through Christ’s Humanity: One of the key theological principles in opposing Docetism is expressed in the saying of Gregory of Nazianzus: “What is not assumed is not healed.” This means that for Christ to redeem humanity, he had to fully assume human nature. If Christ did not truly become human, then humanity’s fallen nature would not be fully redeemed. Therefore, the church teaches that the Incarnation, where God truly became man, is necessary for salvation.

Conclusion

Docetism is an early heresy that denies the true humanity of Jesus Christ, claiming that Christ only appeared to have a physical body and that his sufferings, death, and resurrection were not real. Rooted in Gnostic dualism, Docetism rejected the idea that the divine Son of God could take on material flesh, which it saw as inherently corrupt. The historic Christian orthodox view opposes Docetism by affirming the full humanity and full divinity of Christ, as expressed in the doctrines of the Incarnation and the Atonement. Jesus’ real suffering and death are essential to the Christian understanding of salvation, and his bodily resurrection is central to the hope of eternal life. The early church, through councils like Nicaea and Chalcedon, decisively rejected Docetism, affirming the true humanity and divinity of Christ as essential to the gospel.

By Topic

Joy

By Scripture

Old Testament

Genesis

Exodus

Leviticus

Numbers

Deuteronomy

Joshua

Judges

Ruth

1 Samuel

2 Samuel

1 Kings

2 Kings

1 Chronicles

2 Chronicles

Ezra

Nehemiah

Esther

Job

Psalms

Proverbs

Ecclesiastes

Song of Solomon

Isaiah

Jeremiah

Lamentations

Ezekiel

Daniel

Hosea

Joel

Amos

Obadiah

Jonah

Micah

Nahum

Habakkuk

Zephaniah

Haggai

Zechariah

Malachi

New Testament

Matthew

Mark

Luke

John

Acts

Romans

1 Corinthians

2 Corinthians

Galatians

Ephesians

Philippians

Colossians

1 Thessalonians

2 Thessalonians

1 Timothy

2 Timothy

Titus

Philemon

Hebrews

James

1 Peter

2 Peter

1 John

2 John

3 John

Jude

Revelation

By Author

Latest Links