Oliver O'Donovan's The Disappearance of Ethics: The Gifford Lectures explores the diminishing role of ethics in modern discourse, attributing this decline to historical and philosophical shifts that have eroded the foundational place of moral reasoning in society. O'Donovan, a renowned Christian ethicist and theologian, traces the philosophical changes that have led to a "disappearance" of ethics and offers a theological vision as the way forward. He argues that a coherent ethical framework, grounded in theological truths, is essential for understanding human purpose and moral responsibility. This framework, he suggests, can provide a universal basis for moral discourse, fostering a common understanding of human flourishing and guiding societies toward the good.
The Historical Erosion of Ethics
O'Donovan begins by tracing the roots of ethics in Western thought, situating it within both classical and Christian traditions where the ethical life was seen as the pursuit of the "good life." Ancient philosophers like Aristotle considered ethics inseparable from community and politics, linking it directly to the flourishing of society. In the Christian tradition, ethics was understood as grounded in God’s will, guiding individuals to act within a communal vision aligned with divine law and the Kingdom of God.
However, O'Donovan argues that with the Enlightenment, ethics underwent a transformation, moving toward a more individualistic and subjective framework. Thinkers like Kant shifted focus toward individual autonomy and rationality, setting aside communal conceptions of the "good." Later, Nietzsche and others challenged even these rationalist foundations, contributing to an increasingly fragmented view of ethics. O'Donovan suggests that this fragmentation has resulted in moral relativism, where ethical standards have become subjective and lack binding authority, particularly in public and political life.
Ethics in a Fragmented Modernity
For O'Donovan, this fragmentation reflects a "disappearance" of ethics in the fullest sense. Ethical discourse today often lacks the coherence and binding power it once held, leading to a reliance on non-moral frameworks like psychology, economics, and technology. This change, he argues, means that societies discuss human actions primarily in terms of efficiency, utility, or individual rights, seldom addressing them in terms of moral goodness or justice. This absence of a shared moral foundation makes it challenging to address questions of human dignity, purpose, and communal well-being coherently.
The result is a disconnection between individuals’ moral intuitions and the frameworks available to address them. In the face of this ethical vacuum, O'Donovan believes that humanity must return to a theologically grounded ethics that can offer a comprehensive vision for understanding human purpose and moral agency.
The Role of Theology in Recovering Ethics
Central to O'Donovan’s argument is the idea that the disappearance of ethics reflects a deeper theological issue. Ethical thought, he believes, can only be coherent if it is grounded in a vision of human purpose that transcends individual preferences or societal trends. For O'Donovan, this vision is rooted in the theological understanding of human beings as created in the image of God, endowed with dignity and moral agency, and called to pursue the good as part of a divine order.
O'Donovan’s call for a theological grounding does not merely aim to return to Christian ethics in a sectarian sense. Rather, he emphasizes the need for a framework that can address the moral concerns of all humanity. He argues that a universal vision of ethics, based on shared principles like human dignity, justice, and love, can unify people across diverse backgrounds. This theological foundation, he believes, can restore ethics to its rightful place as an authoritative guide in personal and communal life.
A Call to Recover Moral Agency and Responsibility
O'Donovan also emphasizes the need to recover moral agency and responsibility in a world where ethics has become fragmented. He argues that individuals must see themselves as accountable to a higher standard, one rooted in divine authority and moral law, rather than in personal choice or cultural preference. This shift, he believes, would reawaken a sense of moral responsibility, encouraging individuals to act justly and to pursue the common good.
By cultivating a culture that values integrity, accountability, and moral formation, O'Donovan hopes to reinvigorate a sense of individual and communal responsibility. He sees practices like moral education, character development, and the fostering of communities committed to virtue as essential for restoring people’s ability to engage meaningfully with ethical questions.
Persuading a Pluralistic Audience of the Importance of Theological Ethics
Understanding the diverse viewpoints in modern society, O'Donovan recognizes the challenge of persuading people with secular or differing beliefs about the value of a theological approach to ethics. To bridge this gap, he employs several strategies aimed at making his thesis accessible and compelling to a broader audience:
Appealing to Shared Experiences of Ethical Fragmentation: O'Donovan begins by addressing the widespread sense of moral confusion in society, a sentiment that resonates across religious and secular lines. By highlighting the inconsistencies and limitations of purely secular ethics — including relativism and individualism — he invites those with other perspectives to consider that the solutions may lie beyond a secular framework. This appeal to shared concerns serves as an entry point for discussing the need for a stable, unified ethical foundation.
Engaging Historical and Philosophical Arguments: O'Donovan draws on the rich history of ethical thought, referencing figures like Aristotle and Kant to show that ethical reasoning has long been connected to a transcendent “good.” This historical grounding suggests that ethics need not be purely religious but can instead reflect a broader philosophical commitment to shared human values. By connecting his ideas to respected secular thinkers, O'Donovan encourages readers to recognize the potential benefits of a theological foundation, even if they do not fully embrace it.
Emphasizing Universal Concepts like Human Dignity and Purpose: O'Donovan focuses on universal ethical concepts like human dignity and moral purpose, which resonate widely regardless of religious affiliation. By grounding these values in the notion of being created in the image of God, he offers an objective basis for human worth that speaks to believers and non-believers alike. This emphasis on the intrinsic dignity of all people can encourage a diverse audience to appreciate a moral framework that affirms universal human rights and responsibilities.
Framing Theological Ethics in Terms of Human Flourishing and the Common Good: Rather than presenting his thesis in strictly theological terms, O'Donovan speaks of ethics as a means to human flourishing, communal well-being, and justice. By framing his argument in this way, he appeals to universal desires for societal health and personal fulfillment. This language makes theological ethics accessible, emphasizing that its principles align with shared aspirations for justice and peace.
Highlighting Practical Benefits and Real-World Implications: To make his case tangible, O'Donovan points to the practical benefits of a coherent, theologically grounded ethics, such as stronger communities and more respectful societies. By demonstrating the positive social outcomes that could arise from adopting such an approach, he appeals to a pragmatic sensibility. This approach suggests that theological ethics not only serves religious goals but can contribute to the broader societal good.
Encouraging Dialogue and Intellectual Curiosity: Finally, O'Donovan adopts an invitational tone, engaging respectfully with opposing views and encouraging others to question the assumptions of contemporary ethics. This approach invites others to explore his thesis without feeling coerced, appealing to the intellectual curiosity of those from different backgrounds. By fostering a culture of dialogue, he shows a willingness to discuss ethics in a way that respects diverse beliefs.
Conclusion
O'Donovan’s The Disappearance of Ethics offers a profound response to the fragmented state of modern moral discourse, calling for a return to a theologically grounded ethics that can provide a coherent vision for human life. Through historical, philosophical, and theological insights, he argues that ethics must be rooted in universal truths that transcend individual preferences. By appealing to shared human experiences, historical continuity, universal concepts of dignity, and the practical benefits of moral coherence, O'Donovan makes a compelling case that theological ethics can speak meaningfully to all of humanity. His approach provides a vision not only for Christian believers but for a diverse audience seeking a shared foundation for ethical discourse in an increasingly divided world.
----
Related Essay
The Tension in O'Donovan's Vision @Monergism