PART ONE: OUR MOTHER

 

Chap. 4: A “Reformational” Understanding of Our Mother

 

 

A “Reformational” Church: Reformed, and Always Reforming

In order to better understand the visible Church, let us consider what it means to be “reformational” or “Reformed and Always Reforming”.  Why would we need (or want!?) a “Reformational” understanding of the visible Church?  Well, don’t forget an important implication of the Church being visible is that she has been providentially watched over and guided by God’s gracious Spirit throughout all of history.  In fact, as Christ said in some of his final words: “I am with you even to the end of the age.”  Christ will never leave nor forsake his Church. 

 

We should study the “Reformational” understanding of the visible Church, because the Church of the Reformation was simply part of the visible Church.  As Christ’s visible Church today, we should study with the visible Church in every age, and thus the reason why studying together with all the saints, both dead and living, is so important.  But let me make a remark about “Reformed”.

 

I admit that when some hear the term “Reformed” today, they conjure up in their minds an unfair caricature.  Some Evangelicals imagine a group of narrow-minded, lukewarm, confessional Christians who aren’t very nice and who quote Calvin a lot and talk about election all the time.  This is a caricature and no Evangelical Christian should allow this caricature to cloud his or her judgment.  Sure, there are Christians who happen to call themselves “Reformed” who need to grow in the grace of Jesus, but no matter what kind of Evangelical we are, Reformed or otherwise, we are all learning as Christ’s disciples how to be more loving and humble.  All Evangelical Christians rely on He who began a good work in us to complete it (Phil. 1:6).

 

What I would like to do in this chapter is more particularly speak of what it means to have a “Reformational” understanding of the Church as our Mother, by studying the historical story of the Reformation, and asking God to give the modern evangelical Church wisdom to know more about the Church as a gift of Christ as an institution, family, and school.  Additionally, I want to remind all that the term “Reformed” is so much more than a mere “Tulip” [Note: TULIP is an acrostic that sums up historical Reformed Calvinism’s emphasis on how God saves an individual]. 

 

Being Reformed is a way of thinking that constantly asks the question: “Is this Biblical?” to whatever the visible Church preaches and teaches, how she behaves, and what she assumes to be true.  You know we Evangelicals criticize our Roman Catholic friends for being too traditional, and even raising tradition above Scripture.  But did you know that anytime we teach something, or do something and assume it is biblical without asking the question “Is this Biblical?” we are guilty of raising tradition above Scripture as well (whether it is custom or cultural methodology, or way of doing something like evangelism or worship)?  If we set out with good intentions to be and do Church in this world in a manner that is merely pleasing to us, or because something seems to be successful or “works”, we are as guilty of raising tradition above the Bible as anyone else; We need to keep this in mind.  If you believe the Bible is the Word of God, then you should always be asking: “Is it Biblical?”

 

We should remember that for now my simple definition of “Reformed” is to ask the question of every teaching and practice within the visible Church “Is this Biblical?” and seek to answer it not only with other Christians in my generation, but how it has been answered by those in our family who came before us.  To be “Reformed” foundationally means has two aspects, one is historical, and the other is theological.  So being “Reformed” essentially means that you 1) Historically trace your evangelical lineage back to the Reformation of the Sixteenth Century where the gospel was again clearly proclaimed; and 2) Theologically, you constantly ask the question of every teaching and practice in the Church “Is this Biblical?”

 

We will consider this further as we seek to understand more of the “Reformational” aspect of Scripture, but let me say that being “Reformed” according to my simple definition above is something dynamic, not static.  “Reformational” which is the term I prefer is like the concept of love; it is not a past-tense kind of thing.  We are not merely “Reformed” (past tense as if we have fully arrived!), but rather we should all be “Reformational” or always “reforming”.  Why? Because of what I said above; all Christians should constantly be asking “Is this Biblical?”

 

Do we want to “do church” and to “be church” (teaching and practice) apart from what the Scriptures teaches us? No! All Evangelical, Bible-believing Christians should desire to be obedient to God’s Word.  How do we do this? We ask about all that we teach (whether we are consciously confessional or not) “Is this Biblical?” and has this been taught by other biblical teachers in the past and present.  We also ask in matters of practice such as worship, evangelicalism, and whatever other Christian privilege, no matter how much it works, feels right, or seems right, “Is this Biblical?”

 

I want you to ask if what I have taught you even in this chapter “Is this Biblical?”  I am seeking to be by God’s grace, but I ask your patience and your willingness to listen as we seek to find a “Reformational” way of doing and being the visible Church of Christ.

 

The Marks of a True Church; Or, "Are You My Mother?"

We should all thank God that no visible branch of the one Church of Christ is in its final form with regard to maturity in Christ (Phil. 1:6; Gal. 4:19ff).  We should not be surprised by immaturity, imperfections, and disagreements within the Church (cf. 1 Corinthians 11:19).  We are all growing and therefore by God’s grace, we should remember first that we will never find a perfect congregation of Christ’s people, although as I will argue in this chapter, we can find a faithful congregation of Christ’s people.  How do we find this faithfulness, although we will not find perfection?  We will consider the “reformational” way of thinking with regard to the three marks of the Church.

 

How do we find a faithful visible branch of Christ’s one holy catholic apostolic church if we have come to better understand the visible aspect of it? How do we find the right congregation of visible saints where we can “fit in” and be more faithful to Christ and obedient to his Word to seek unity and one-minded-ness as we learned that we are commanded to do in the last chapter? This can be a difficult thing that we must first humbly ask God prayerfully for wisdom and help in guiding us according to Scriptural principles.  We should remember that as Christ’s people, we are called to strive together for unity and one-minded-ness and this must begin in our formally joining a congregation of Christ’s people. Let’s realize that we are called to work, labor, strive together in order to be a faithful Church.

 

With this struggle to remain in the Church even though we have perhaps been misguided by error in biblical teaching in your past, and might have experienced real personal pain by other Christians in a local congregation, the reformer and theologian of the Sixteenth Century, John Calvin and the pastor-elders of the Reformation give us help in recognizing the true marks of the visible Church so that we can seek to be a part of the visible Church on earth, even though we have had bad experiences because we want to be obedient about being one and seeking unity.  

 

But the question you might ask is “Why should Calvin speak on this issue in our study?”  In this chapter, I want to begin to put into practice what we learned in the last chapter concerning being and doing church together with all the saints both dead and living.  Those dead saints (sorry!) of the Reformation, particularly the teacher and theologian John Calvin, can aid us with wisdom to better understand our present situation.  John Calvin and the other Reformers, or Evangelicals who were seeking to be faithful to Christ’s gospel and His visible Church, were in a similar situation back then that we are in presently.

 

How is there a similar situation in Evangelical Churches today and with the Evangelicals like John Calvin in the Sixteenth Century Reformation?  For John Calvin and the other Evangelicals seeking to make the gospel of the Lord Jesus known to all during the Reformation, those who had been deceived by the Church of Rome were hurting people looking for the true visible Church of Christ on the earth.  Many people had been deceived by the false gospel propagated and preached by the largest branch of the visible Church (the Roman Catholic communion).  Because of these abuses, some well-meaning Evangelicals left the visible church altogether in attempt to “start over”, and “reform” the Church by themselves, even though they might not have been called and ordained formally in the Church (which is another similarity today). 

 

Those who stayed in the visible Church of the Reformation, who heeded Calvin’s advice about staying regardless of abuses, needed to know how to identify a faithful visible congregation of Christ’s Church.  These evangelicals cared about the teaching of the Word of God and did not want to send the wrong message to the world that because the largest branch of the visible Church of Christ had taught a false gospel, the gates of hell had apparently prevailed against Christ’s visible Church on earth.  This conclusion was the one of the important reasons that they stayed in the visible Church and sought to reform the church from within; this is a perfect example of what it means to be “reformational” (and they knew the Church was one as well, this was the other reason why they sought to stay within the loving arms of our mother).

 

Some of the evangelicals of the Reformation left the visible Church entirely because of abuses, and these evangelicals became known as “Radical Reformers” because many of the Reformation’s pastor-elders perceived them to be “throwing the ecclesiastical baby out with the Roman Catholic bathwater”.  Some of the Radical Reformers who left the visible Church and tried to "start over" individualistically, were denying the unity or one-ness of Christ’s Church as well as declaring in essence that the gates of hell had prevailed against Christ's visible Church here on earth.  The Radical Reformers were called to repentance for leaving the visible Church and for separating individualistically from the one Institution, family and school that was founded on the apostles and the prophets (Eph. 2:20).

 

From within the church, and as a defense of Christ’s visible Church, Calvin wrote so that those who were looking to find their true mother and to continue to grow in grace and holiness might be able to recognize her (even though the largest branch of the visible Church had become corrupt).  Calvin taught that we could always recognize our mother by true teaching of the Word and the right administration of the two sacraments Christ had instituted in baptism and the Lord's Supper, and by implication, discipline (discipline was added as a third mark in his discussion of the sacraments in his Institutes)[1].

 

Calvin says that the two most important marks or signs of a true visible Church of Christ here on earth (no matter what denomination or name is on the sign in the front of the building, whatever the branch or congregation of the one holy catholic and apostolic church) are the right preaching and teaching of God's Word and the right administration of the Sacraments.  He writes:

 

"From this the face of the church comes forth and becomes visible to our eyes. Wherever we see the Word of God purely preached and heard, and the sacraments administered according to Christ's institution, there, it is not to be doubted, a church of God exists (cf. Eph. 2:20).  For [Christ's] promise cannot fail: 'Wherever two or three are gathered in my name, there I am in the midst of them" (Matt. 18:20)." (‘Institutes’, IV.1.ix).

 

Calvin and Rome: “No Mother at All!”

The Roman Catholic communion in the Sixteenth Century taught that she was the one and only true “mother” of all saints, the only visible Church on earth primarily because of their doctrine of Peter and supposed apostolic succession.  Rome taught that to leave her pale would be dividing the Church that Christ has united.  In response to this teaching of Rome, Calvin responded wisely to them.  In Calvin’s Commentary on A Harmony of the Evangelists (Gospels), he writes against the presumption of the Roman Catholics with regard to having the right to the succession of Peter in their communion.  Calvin points out in his commentary, that even though Rome might claim Peter’s authority as apostle and foundation of the Church, they do not have the marks of apostolicity, and are therefore by definition no church at all. 

 

What Calvin was teaching so brilliantly was that if Rome, the largest branch of the visible Church, had forsaken the gospel, then this communion, although it looked like a church from the outside, was not a Church at all, but an empty shell; a woman perhaps, but one without a gospel soul, and therefore not our true “mother” who gives birth to us, nurtures and feeds us with the gospel.  He argues against Rome by showing Rome that she does not hold to the apostolic teaching of the one holy catholic apostolic visible Church.  Although Rome might say she is one, holy, catholic, she could not claim to be apostolic and therefore she was not a legitimate “mother” to the saints of God.  Calvin writes:

 

“For no man in his senses will admit the principle which the Papists take for granted, that what is here granted to Peter [in the keys of the Kingdom in Matthew 16:18-19] was intended to be transmitted by him to posterity by hereditary right; for he does not receive permission to give any thing to his successors…Though the uninterrupted succession were fully established [by Rome], still the Pope will gain nothing by it till he has proved himself to be Peter’s lawful successor….Though the Bishop of Rome had been the lawful successor of Peter [because Peter supposedly died at Rome], since by his own treachery he has deprived himself of so high an honor, all that Christ bestowed on the successors of Peter avails him nothing.

 

That the Pope’s court resides at Rome is sufficiently known, but no mark of a Church there can be pointed out.” (emphasis added)

 

Even today the face of the church comes forth and is visible to our eyes through the faithful preaching of the Word, the right administration of the sacraments, and we should add as a third mark biblical discipline that is meant to restore sinners and uphold the peace and purity of Christ's visible Church in doctrine and life (and this third mark of discipline was added in the Belgic Confession, the Scots Confession, and the Westminster Confession and Catechisms which are other faithful confessions of what God’s word teaches). 

 

The third mark of discipline was needed to uphold the first two: preaching and teaching of the Word and the right administration of the sacraments.[2]

 

The Word of God: Verbal and Visible

The Bible teaches that we must seek to strive for unity and to be one-minded, not merely as members of a local and faithful congregation of Christ’s institution, family and school, but also with those saints who came before us.  The three marks of the Church articulated in the Reformation of the Church of the Sixteenth Century are helpful in trying to find a true and faithful congregation of God’s people so that you can obediently and formally seek unity with the one holy catholic apostolic Church.  You should seek prayerfully to find a pastor, who is in submission to other pastor-elders, one who is accountable to faithful pastor-elders within his own generation, but also a pastor who is faithful to the faithful pastor-elders and teachers who shepherded God’s flock long before your pastor was born (meaning the pastor interprets his Bible with those who faithfully interpreted their Bibles before he was born). 

 

Let me have you consider four sets of questions that we will consider in more detail in part two on the ordained ministry.  As you read and consider prayerfully these four questions, think about how we often try to disconnect or remove the Word of God out from the visible Church.  The Word and the Church should be distinct but never separated.  God has not given his people the Bible to be used outside, or apart from Christ’ Church.  Rather, Christ has given the Bible or the Word of God to be taught by pastor-elders within the Church and this should be considered in our day.  Consider these questions:

 

1)    How do you know that the books of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God? In other words, how do you know that there are 66 books, specifically 27 books in the New Testament? Did the Word of God in completed form fall out of heaven, or do we depend upon the Church under the providential guidance of the Holy Spirit to discover what books are inspired long before we were born? If we trust God’s Spirit and His Church to collect and gather inspired books, why can’t we interpret these Bibles with God’s Spirit and His Church?

 

2)    How do you interpret these 66 books and know for a fact that this is not just your opinion but the teaching of the faithful Church throughout history? In other words, how do you avoid relativism in interpretation (i.e. “I think it means thus and such…”)?  When you lay your head on your pillow each night, how can you know before Christ himself that you are correctly “handling the Word of truth” (2 Tim. 2:15), and that you have the true interpretation of Scripture? Is this for you to determine alone?

 

3)    Who has Christ instituted on earth to preserve the Word of God and to teach it to His people?

 

4)    Where does the new birth “ordinarily” take place, and if it takes place “extraordinarily”, where does the new life find food and drink to grow and mature? Even if the new birth (being “born again”) takes place outside the visible Church, doesn’t the new life depend upon discipleship under the Word in the Church? In other words, are we called merely to conversion, or discipleship in the Word together with all the saints?

 

Have you ever thought about these questions?  At this point, I want to stress the importance of the right teaching and interpretation of the Word of God within the visible Church.  We will look in more detail later, but think about why the Word and the Church should go together, hand in hand, as the Bible and reason seem to indicate.

 

Additionally, we should seek to find a congregation where baptism and the Lord’s Supper are rightly administered.  What this means is that Christ has given us baptism as an initiation into the visible Church (whether you believe in infant baptism or merely believer’s baptism, you will agree that it is an initiation into the visible Church of Christ, but that is another book and another conversation), and the Lord’s Supper as a commemoration of being members of the visible Church. 

 

This is not a book on baptism or the Lord’s Supper (what is called “sacraments” historically), but simply stated, these are two practices Christ has ordained for his Church so that he can communicate his grace by His Spirit to His people as they are done by faith, believing in God’s promises fulfilled in Christ.  Both of these practices are commanded by our Lord, and they are to be administered only by pastor-elders who have been called, ordained, and given the ministry of serving Christ’s people (more on this in part two).

 

The Word of God written in our Bibles is the verbal Word of God, where when we received the words spoken by faith, we receive the instruction of our Lord Jesus himself.  The Word of God visual, or baptism and the Lord’s Supper, show forth the faithfulness of God in Christ that the written word speaks about and we also see and believe by faith.  In baptism and the Lord’s Supper we see what we hear in the verbal written Word of God.  These two must go together as we learn together with all the saints.

 

Discipline as Your Mother’s Children and Restoration to Her Loving Arms

The third mark of the Church is discipline, and this mark is the one most often misunderstood.  Before we look at this biblically, allow me to ask you how much you believe in accountability?  Because of our sin, we all need it, especially pastor-teachers who have been given the awesome responsibility of teaching the truth of Scripture, together with all the saints, to the people of God.  The souls of the people of God are under their pastoral leadership as shepherd of the flock of God. 

 

Discipline maintains the proper and official and formal accountability that we need as the sinful, yet saved people of God.  Disciple is designed to bring repentance and it is restorative in nature (Heb. 12:1-8; cf. Matt. 18:15-18).  The design or goal of any discipline is ongoing accountability to the truth of Scripture, and if one gets out of line and teaches any error, or lives a way that is inconsistent with Scriptural teaching, helps bring godly repentance and to restore sinners back to the visible Church.

 

As the Apostle Paul teaches in 1 Corinthians 5, the visible Church cannot “judge the world”, and this implies a power of disciplining those in error or who live wrongly.  But the visible Church has been given the power by Christ, particularly those in the apostolic office of minister (Matt. 18:15-18) to graciously judge those who err in life and doctrine with hopes that they will be restored.  Paul tells the Church at Corinth:

 

1 Corinthians 5:1-7: It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father's wife. 2 And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you. 3 For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present, I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did such a thing. 4 When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, 5 you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. 6 Your boasting is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? 7 Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.

 

This scriptural teaching concerning discipline shows that we are to discipline those in the Church who live inconsistently from the gospel of Jesus, and those who err in their teaching as well.  We are to “judge” in a good way, in order to discipline, and bring restoration (v. 5), and keep the peace and purity of the visible Church (vv. 6-7).  If we do not practice discipline in the visible Church, we are saying to the world that we don’t care much about the peace and purity of Christ’s institution, family and school.  If we do not practice discipline then how do we keep our pastor-elders accountable to Scripture alone? If we do not practice disciple, how can we make sure the Word of God is rightly preached and the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper are rightly administered?

 

If we do not discipline, we do not show forth real love.  Even God himself shows his love in discipline:

 

Hebrews 12:4-11: In your struggle against sin you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood. 5 And have you forgotten the exhortation that addresses you as sons? "My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor be weary when reproved by him. 6 For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives." 7 It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? 8 If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons. 9 Besides this, we have had earthly fathers who disciplined us and we respected them. Shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits and live? 10 For they disciplined us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but he disciplines us for our good, that we may share his holiness. 11 For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.

 

According to this passage in Hebrews 12, discipline is something that all loving parents do.  The discipline of our “mother” is the same.  The Church is the place where Christ has given some who he calls to apostolic ministry, the awesome responsibility of “binding on earth that which is bound in heaven”, and “loosing on earth that which is loosed in heaven” through the keys of the Kingdom (more on this in part two).  It is not legalistic to have discipline in the visible church in order to seek unity, one-minded-ness, peace and purity, it is rather very loving and God-like according to Hebrews 12, and it is designed to bring sanctification and holiness (Heb. 12:11).

 

We will consider this further in part two on the ordained ministry, but I ask you to ask yourself three more questions at this time:

 

1) How do you know that you’re hearing the truth of the Word of God when it is preached every Lord’s Day? Do you make this judgment individualistically based on the fact that the pastor happens to agree with your interpretation? If this is all you have to find truth, then you might be a relativist.  That is, you might think that it is merely true for you, but you have no greater objectivity than that?  I am not trying to hurt any feelings here; I just want you to consider this.

 

2) Do you participate in baptism and the Lord’s Supper frequently? Do you place a high regard of these institutions of Christ, just because Christ has instituted them, or do you think they are something you can take or leave? Do you emphasize other means to become more like Christ other than what Jesus has instituted? For instance, do you teach that small group Bible studies and Evangelical “quiet time” are more important than baptism and the Lord’s Supper? Small group Bible studies and “quiet time” may be an additional means for God’s Spirit to encourage the people of God, but do you in practice deny what Christ has instituted and appointed for his Church in baptism and the Lord’s Supper? (Remember what we learned above, when we do not ask “Is it Biblical?” we can easily fall into the same error as our Roman Catholic friends by setting up a tradition above the teaching of Scripture- -do you do this?).

 

3) Is there accountability in your congregation? Is the pastor studying with other men in his generation as well as those pastor-elders who taught the Bible correctly before him (‘apostolicity’)? If your pastor, or another member of your congregation, or yourself sinned against God publicly and got out of line with regard to biblical teaching, is there any formal discipline that would hinder this sinful life and erring doctrine?

 

Other institutions, families and schools realize the importance of discipline in order to operate decently and in order (cf. 1 Corinthians 14:33, 40), how much more should Christ’s institution, family and school on earth have these in place not only to better seek unity and one-minded-ness, but also to obtain peace and purity in each congregation as the light of the world, as the world watches us as to whether we believe sin and error in teaching is really wrong or not.  Discipline is another important reason why we formally join local congregations, with a goal toward seeking unity together with all the saints, as well as to submit humbly under faithful pastor-elders so that they can shepherd our souls (1 Peter 5:1-7; Hebrews 13:7, 17).

 

In every institution in this country you have rules, even the pagans knows and recognizes these things.  If you break the rules there are consequences.  In families, we discipline our children because they have said or done something wrong, or inappropriate, or sinful.  Why? Because we want our visible family to be seen as healthy.  In schools (and boy do I know about this one!), we have disciplinarians and principals to help children to be obedient, so that there will be peace and purity in the learning process.

 

How much more do we need to seek to find our one mother, the visible Church of Christ, by seeking to find those who are preaching the Word, rightly administering the sacraments, and upholding the first two marks with the third, which is biblical and godly discipline.  The teaching of the Word, the administration of the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, and especially discipline has been abused in the history of the Church.  However, we should remember again that the abuse of something does not mean that it is wrong. 

 

If Christ has established these three marks, and I believe he has as I tried to show scripturally above, then we have an obligation to be obedient to Christ in the Church.  We should use the three marks of the Church to keep us from being part of an unfaithful congregation who calls itself a “church”, so that we might truly grow and mature into the likeness of Christ.  Do we really believe two particular Scriptures below where the Apostle Paul teaches plainly for all Christians to remember:

 

ESV Ephesians 4:13 until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, 14 so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes.

 

ESV 2 Timothy 4:3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, 4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths. 5 As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.

 

Do you believe these warnings from Paul?  If it is a possibility to remain children (Eph. 4:14), to be deceived by every wind of doctrine and by human cunning and deceitfulness (Eph. 4:13), and to be tossed around the sea of differing opinions and interpretations of the Word of God, then don’t you think it would seriously behoove us all to look for our mother by these three marks.  If there is coming a real time when people will not endure sound teaching, and will accumulate to themselves teachers to suit their own passions, who will lead the people of God away from the truth into myth-telling, then don’t you think we should seriously and prayerfully seek the Lord’s help to find a true congregation of Christ’s saints?

 

In our next chapter we will discuss the wisdom we can learn from other evangelicals of the Reformation of the Sixteenth Century.