| Users online: 24 | Tell Friend | Add to Favorites Links: Popular | New | Pick | Top Rated | Random |
Four-point Calvinism fails the test of Christ-centered interpretation because this view tends to see the TULIP as an abstraction. But the TULIP only works when we see Christ at its center. Consider the TULIP as a chiasm with the "L" at the top of the pyramid. It is Jesus Christ which makes sense of all the doctrines of grace. Four-point Calvinists who reject Limited Atonement but embrace irresistible grace must consider this: Irresistible grace is not some abstract doctrine but must be seen in relation to Jesus Christ, specially in relation to the grace purchased by Christ upon the cross. The Spirit of Christ illuminates, regenerates and effectually brings to faith his elect. And this enabling, effectual grace is, from first to last, Christ-centered. It does not come out of a void, nor from some hidden source of grace in God the Father. Therefore Christ must have died for the elect so as to purchase that grace in a way – a redemptive way – that he did not die for the non-elect. That is why we often call it particular redemption. Irresistible grace is one of the redemptive benefits purchased by Jesus Christ ... and it was never granted to the non-elect nor intended for them. I believe that until Jesus Christ is seen as central to the TULIP then four-pointers will continue to reject what is plain.
John Hendryx
| Sort by: Date added - Rating - Title |
- Jesus Christ: The Interpretive Key to the Scripture

J.W. Hendryx - With Four Examples of Doctrinal Errors that Arise When this Key is not Used
- A Defense of Particular Redemption

William Rushton
- Amyraldian Controversy

Sam Storms
- Warfield on Four-Point Calvinism

B.B. Warfield
- The Inconsistency of Four-Point Calvinism

Christopher Alexion
- There are No Four-Point Calvinists

John Hendryx
- Why and For Whom Did Christ Die?

Phil Johnson
- Definite Atonement

R. Scott Clark
- There are No Four-Point Calvinists

John Hendryx
- The Doctrine of Particular Redemption A Defense from the Scriptures

Shane Rosenthal
- The Extent of the Sacrificial Atonement of Our Lord

Gregg Strawbridge, Ph.D.
- Atonement: Both Limited and Otherwise

Mike Wilkins
- The Case for a Definite and Complete Atonement

Francis Turretin
- Whose Sin Laid on Jesus?

Charles Spurgeon
- For Whom Did Christ Die?

Charles Hodge
- All Equals Many, but Many Does Not Equal All

John G. Reisinger
- The Extent of the Atonement: Who Did Christ Die For?

Matt Perman
- The Extent of the Atonement: Answering Objections

Matt Perman
- Inconsistent Underlying Assumptions the Cause of Unsound Theology

John W. Hendryx
- For Whom Did Jesus Taste Death?

John Piper - Hebrews 2:9
- For Whom Did Christ Taste Death?

John Piper 14.2 MB MP3
| Sort by: Date added - Rating - Title |
| Recommended Reading | |
|
| Similar Pages | |
|
|








Death of Death in The Death of Christ
Person and Work of Christ
Mission Accomplished: The Work of Christ