| Users online: 41 | Tell Friend | Add to Favorites Links: Popular | New | Pick | Top Rated | Random |
Charles H. Spurgeon
Some persons love the doctrine of universal atonement because they say, "It is so beautiful. It is a lovely idea that Christ should have died for all men; it commends itself," they say, "to the instincts of humanity; there is something in it full of joy and beauty. I admit there is, but beauty may be often associated with falsehood.
There is much which I might admire in the theory of universal redemption, but I will just show what the supposition necessarily involves. If Christ on His cross intended to save every man, then He intended to save those who were lost before He died. If the doctrine be true, that He died for all men, then He died for some who were in hell before He came into this world, for doubtless there were even then myriads there who had been cast away because of their sins.
Once again, if it was Christ's intention to save all men, how deplorably has He been disappointed, for we have His own testimony that there is a lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, and into that pit of woe have been cast some of the very persons who, according to the theory of universal redemption, were bought with His blood that seems to me a conception a thousand times more repulsive than any of those consequences which are said to be associated with the Calvinistic and Christian doctrine of special and particular redemption. To think that my Saviour died for men who were or are in hell, seems a supposition too horrible for me to entertain. To imagine for a moment that He was the Substitute for all the sons of men, and that God, having first punished the Substitute, afterwards punished he sinners themselves, seems to conflict with all my ideas of Divine justice. That Christ should offer an atonement and satisfaction for the sins of all men, and that afterwards some of those very men should be punished for the sins for which Christ had already atoned, appears to me to be the most monstrous iniquity that could ever have been imputed to Saturn, to Janus, to the goddess of the Thugs, or to the most diabolical heathen deities. God forbid that we should ever think thus of Jehovah, the just and wise and good!"
| Sort by: Date added - Rating - Title |
- 12 Examples from Spurgeon on Particular Redemption

Colin Maxwell
- A Confutation of the Dutch-Arminian Tenet of Universal Redemption

Theoph. Brabourn
- A Defense of Particular Redemption

William Rushton
- For Whom Did Christ Die?

Charles Hodge
- For Whom Did Christ Die?

C.H. Spurgeon
- Justification and the Extent of the Atonement

Charles Spurgeon - Except from Morning By Morning
- Limited Atonement in Historical Theology

Strange Baptist Fire
- Particular Redemption

Charles Spurgeon
- Particular Redemption

R. L. Dabney
- Particular Redemption & Discriminating Grace, That Doctrine which most endeareth Christ to a Soul

Samuel Rutherford
- Particular Redemption Scripturally Defended

Stanford E. Murrell
- Places of Scripture seeming to favour Universal Atonement, Vindicated

Samuel Rutherford
- Scriptural Particularism

R. B. Kuiper
- The Atonement

John Owen
- The Calvinism of Charles Haddon Spurgeon

Colin Maxwell - Limited Atonement or Particular Redemption
- The Case for a Definite and Complete Atonement

Francis Turretin
- The Completeness of the Substitution

Horatius Bonar
- The Doctrine of Particular Redemption

John Hurrion
- The Salvation of All Men

John Calvin - 1 Timothy 2:4
- Warfield on Four-Point Calvinism

B.B. Warfield
| Sort by: Date added - Rating - Title |
Sponsor
| Recommended Reading | |
|
| Similar Pages | |
|
|








Death of Death in The Death of Christ
The Sovereignty of God (Unabridged)
Five Points of Calvinism