Monergism

  • Home
  • Directory
  • Our Faith
  • MP3s
  • Bookstore
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Contact

Directory of Theology

Subscribe to Updates

| New Links | Editors' Picks | Popular Links

Four-Point Calvinism

Home >> Bad Theology >>


Those whom God elects, He redeems, and those He redeems, He regenerates and sanctifies. All that believers have they owe to the Triune God. The ELECTION of God the Father, the REDEMPTION of God the Son, and the REGENERATING work of God the Spirit, ought never to be separated. They arise from one and the same Will. The Trinity works in harmony to bring about our salvation. So any theology which disconnects unconditional election from particular redemption is not only inconsistent within their own theology, but makes the Trinity out to have a confused, disharmonious will in the purposes of redemption.

So-called four-point Calvinism fails the test of biblical Calvinism because this view tends to see the TULIP as an abstraction rather than seeing it Christocentrically. The TULIP only works when we see Christ at its center. Consider the TULIP as a chiasm with the "L" at the top of the pyramid. It is Jesus Christ which makes sense of all the doctrines of grace. Four-point Calvinists who reject Limited Atonement but embrace irresistible grace must consider this: Irresistible grace is not some abstract doctrine but must be seen in relation to Jesus Christ, specially in relation to the grace purchased by Christ upon the cross. The Spirit of Christ illuminates, regenerates and effectually brings to faith his elect. And this enabling, effectual grace is, from first to last, Christ-centered. It does not come out of a void, nor from some hidden source of grace in God the Father. Therefore Christ must have died for the elect so as to purchase that grace in a way – a redemptive way – that he did not die for the non-elect. That is why we often call it particular redemption. Irresistible grace is one of the redemptive benefits purchased by Jesus Christ ... and it was never granted to the non-elect nor intended for them. Four point Calvinism not only fails the test of Christocentricity but fails to acknowledge that the Trinity always works in harmony. The Father elects a particular people for himself, Christ dies to secure their redemption and the Holy Sprit unites the same to Christ applying the benefits of Christ's redemption to them. I believe that until Jesus Christ is seen as central to the TULIP then four-pointers will continue to reject the christocentric nature of the Scripture and the gospel is partly distorted as a result.
John Hendryx

Sort by:   Date added - Rating - Title

Title Notes
Jesus Christ: The Interpretive Key to the Scripture J.W. Hendryx - With Four Examples of Doctrinal Errors that Arise When this Key is not Usedicon
A Critical Examination of the Amyraldian View of the Atonement Martyn J. McGeownicon
Limited Atonement R. Scott Clarkicon
Universal Redemption Must be Denied Jonathan Edwardsicon
Inconsistencies in Modified Calvinism Dr. S. Lewis Johnsonicon
Understanding 1 John 2:2 (.pdf) Anonicon
Why and For Whom Did Christ Die? (.pdf) Phil Johnsonicon
Atonement: Both Limited and Otherwise Mike Wilkinsicon
The Case for a Definite and Complete Atonement Francis Turretinicon
Whose Sin Laid on Jesus? Charles Spurgeonicon
All Equals Many, but Many Does Not Equal All John G. Reisingericon
The Extent of the Atonement: Who Did Christ Die For? Matt Permanicon
The Extent of the Atonement: Answering Objections Matt Permanicon
Inconsistent Underlying Assumptions the Cause of Unsound Theology John W. Hendryxicon
For Whom Did Jesus Taste Death? John Piper - Hebrews 2:9icon
For Whom Did Christ Taste Death? John Piper   14.2 MB MP3icon
There are No Four-Point Calvinists John Hendryxicon
Was Anyone Saved at the Cross? (.pdf) James Whiteicon
Warfield on Four-Point Calvinism B.B. Warfieldicon
The Inconsistency of Four-Point Calvinism Christopher Alexionicon
Amyraldian Controversy Sam Stormsicon
Amyraldianism and the Formula Consensus Helvetica (1675) Rev. Angus Stewarticon
Four-Point Calvinism R. C. Sproulicon
For God So Loved the World Tom Ascolicon
Amyraldianism Carl R. Truemanicon
Sort by:   Date added - Rating - Title

-----------------------------------

-----------------------------------


Recommended Reading

Death of Death in The Death of Christ
by John Owen

Person and Work of Christ
by Benjamin B. Warfield


Redemption Accomplished and Applied
by John Murray

Similar Pages

Newest Links

  • A Famous Illustration on the Road to Emmaus
  • Parable of the Soils is Clear Evidence Against Libertarian Free Will
  • How the Kingdom Comes
  • The Wayside and the Rocks
  • The Good Soil

SUBSCRIBE TO THE FEATURES BY EMAIL OR RSS

Top Rated Links

  • Chosen by God: The Doctrine of Unconditional Election (.pdf)
  • The Manifesto of the Reformation - Luther vs. Erasmus on Free Will (.pdf)
  • The “Heavenly” and “Earthly” Yahweh: A Trinitarian Interpretation of Genesis 19:24
  • Reformed Mission Services
  • Mullins Lectures #1 (MP3)

Popular Links

  • Calvin's Commentaries on the Whole Bible
  • Expository Sermons from Genesis to Revelation
  • John Piper - Sermons by Scripture
  • IVP New Testament Commentaries
  • John Gill's Commentary on the Whole Bible

Users online: 66 | Tell Friend | Add to Favorites
Links: Popular | New | Pick | Top Rated | Random

Monergism Copyright © 2009 by CPR Foundation. All rights reserved  |  Site Credits