On what grounds do the children of light defend their faith against the children of this age? The answer is their creation in the image of God. ... man's creation in the image of God does not first and foremost entail his rational facilities, but his built-in teleology as a receptacle and reflector for the divine glory-presence. By his life of faith the Christian reflects the glory of God. Thus, the most compelling apologetic argument the believer can make is his godliness. It is our godliness that most clearly demonstrates our other-worldliness ... Unfortunately, the practice of apologetics has become an academic enterprise. The Kingdom of God is not advanced by winning a debate, but by losing your life. This is the foolishness of the cross. An apology of the hope that is within us (1 Pet 3:15) is a witness to the truthfulness of the gospel-event. It is not a defense of our subjective feelings of hopefulness, but a defense of the objective hope into which we were broght, the living hope which is Christ resurrected from the dead (1 Pet 1:3). If we investigate this text in 1 Peter we are brought to realize that the subject of apologetics arises in the midst of our suffering for righteousness' sake (3:14) and the apologetic of godliness (3:13). It is specifically our patience in suffering for righteousness' sake which bears witness to our eschatological hope (not-yet other-worldliness) as it demonstrates our union with our Saviour (other-worldliness already) who alone truly suffered for righteousness' sake and that with perfect patience. As it is written, "As a lamb led to slaughter He did not open His mouth." And lest we should grow triumphalistic in our apology the imperative is modified by "with gentleness and fear."
Two Age Press
- A Pastor's Sketches: Or, Conversations with Anxious Inquirers (8.6 MB .pdf)

Ichabod Spencer
- Talking About Idolatry in a Postmodern Age

Tim Keller
- Paradox of the Greatness and Wretchedness of Man

Blaise Pascal
- Deconstructing Defeater Beliefs

Tim Keller (pdf)
- Apologetics

John M. Frame - This article was originally published in Kevin Vanhoozer, ed., Dictionary for the Theological Interpretation of the Bible
- Aplogetics Index

Phenomenal resource on all things heretical, questionable and bad.
- Two Dozen (Or So) Theistic Arguments

Alvin Plantinga (pdf)
- Darwin’s Dilemma—“The Horrid Doubt”

Charles Leiter
- Tim Keller Reasons with America

Interview by Susan Wunderink
- Is Our Pain God's Problem?

Bart Ehrman and Tom Wright
- Hidden with Christ in God: A Covenantal Apologetic

Jeff Downs
- 21st-Century Apologetics: Pastor Timothy Keller makes the case for faith.

Reviewed by Anthony Sacramone
- Evangelical stays the course, with grace and humility

Washington Times Review of Tim Keller's New Book
- If God Exists, Why Doesn't He Prove It?

David R. Bickel
- Hypocritical Christians?

Joseph R. Nally
- Defending the Faith: A Crash Course in Apologetics

beginner
- An Interview with Timothy Keller

Anthony Sacramone - February 25, 2008
- Are You Prepared To Give A Defense?

Rod Rosenbladt - A Crash Course In Evidential Apologetics
- People Believe What They Want

Gregory Koukl
- What's So Great About Christianity?

Dr. Paul Kengor
- How and When to Answer Your Critics

Dr. Robert Morey
- Apologetics and the Whole Counsel of God

Dr. Robert Morey
- The Apologetic Methodology of Blaise Pascal

Dr. Phil Fernandes
- PENSÉES

Blaise Pascal
- Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Virginia Tech

Doug Wilson
- Truth Tactics: Principles For Doing Apologetics

Carmen C. DiCello
- The God Wouldn't Do X Fallacy

Peter Pike
- How to Believe in God in the 2000s

John M. Frame
- Do Theistic Proofs Proove the Wrong God?

Douglas Groothuis - Pascal, the "God of the Philosophers" and Peter Geach
- Tools of Apologetics

Greg Bahnsen - Equip and familiarize yourselves with the "tools" of reasoning and argumentation
Monergism Copyright © 2007-2008 by John W. Hendryx. All rights reserved |
Site Credits